Social Reconstruction in Dam-induced Resettlement


Between Tibet and Yunnan’s deep gorges, the large elevation gradient provides prime conditions for hydropower projects. A couple of dams are built on the upper Mekong River, also called the Lancang River. This site tells you about four dam-induced resettlement projects on the Lancang River, including Manwan, Dachaoshan, Nuozhadu, and Xiaowan, and their social reconstruction in the communities of the resettled villages.




Created by Yingqi Tang, Geography M.S Candidate, Oregon State University















Introduction


Involuntary movement, also known as forced displacement, has affected millions of people worldwide. At the end of the 20th century, approximately 80 million people had been displaced due to hydropower projects, including 22.5 million people in China.

Dam-induced migration not only causes material loss, such as loss of homes and agricultural lands, but this migration also causes social capital loss, disrupting individuals’ long term sustainable social networks. In order to understand the factors that might affect social reconstruction in resettled communities, this research studies community social environments at four dam sites (Manwan, Dachaoshan, Xiaowan, and Nuozhadu) on the Lancang River in China.

Data is drawn from the “Community Environment” section of The Lancang River Dam-induced Resettlement Survey (2010). This survey asked questions about participants’ economic health, social networks, and perceived well-being. Chi-square tests were used to compare the differences in survey answers between non-resettled and resettled communities at each dam site.

The results indicated that the resettled communities of Manwan, Dachaoshan and Nuozhadu have higher community environment satisfaction than their non-resettled counterparts, while Xiaowan shows the opposite. Factors, like time for adaption, type of relocation compensation, as well as households’ income, labor, and other resources, and demographics (ethnicity and age), might affect social reconstruction in resettled communities. Identifying potential relationships among these factors and social capital will help to promote strategies for social reconstruction necessitated by future dam-induced displacement.

























Impoverishment Risk and Reconstruction Model

Michael Cernea's Risk and Reconstruction Model

Michael Cernea,1997


The process of dam-induced migration is complex. It should not be seen as a problem of material loss. These identified risks are interconnected, interrelated, and interactive.

The risk of social disarticulation is the main focus of this study. Social disarticulation means that change of physical location disassembles existing social relationships, including kinship, friendship, and business circles. Building social harmony has played a major role in China's long history (Sundararajan, 2015).

























Displacement in China


Note: Data on map is from Dam Impacts Database, Department of Anthropology, College of Liberal Arts, Oregon State University. Information are from different sources, peer-reviewed and non-peer reviewed. This is a work in progress and it does not includes all dams in China.



Definition of large dam:


The International Commission on Large Dams states that a large dam either is at least 15 meters tall from its lowest foundation to its crest, or it stores more than 3 million cubic meters of water with a height between 5 meters and 15 meters.




Displacement and Resettlement:


In the second half of the 20th century, the Chinese government directed programs that relocated people due to economic needs. This “development-induced migration” was massive. Hundreds of millions of people were involuntarily moved due to urban expansions, hydropower or infrastructure development projects. The most famous example is the resettlement caused by the Three Gorges Dam construction, which forced over one million people to leave their homes and resettle in new areas (Xi and Hwang, 2011).

Hydropower dams fulfill the high demand for electricity in southeastern China. However, they also present environmental, cultural and social problems. One of these problems is development-forced displacement and resettlement (DFDR). Groups of people affected by dam displacement are generally from low socioeconomic backgrounds (Aiken and Leigh, 2015; Wilmsen and Webber, 2015). Before water fills a dam, villagers are involuntarily moved to a new area due to the future inundation of villages within a reservoir. This is considered a tradeoff for the potential of hydroelectric dam projects. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2012) indicated that even though the World Bank and multilateral banks gave guidelines for the resettlement process and aimed to ensure displaced population could start over with sufficient resources, a majority of resettlements proved that the displaced population is impoverished.

Many resettled communities faced social problems. Due to the involuntarily nature and the uprooting of villagers’ social relationships, displacement and resettlement disrupts individuals’ familial and commercial networks, possibly for generations (Tilt and Gerkey, 2016). Involuntary displacement has become a stressor for many resettled individuals (Xi and Hwang, 2011). However, future dam construction is unavoidable, and resettlement will take place when newly created reservoirs inundate villages. More considerations on resettlement plan are needed.



Legend



China(Mainland) Boundary


Dam(Hover over the point to see more info )





Lancang River


The Lancang river is one of the three parallel rivers in Yunnan province, China. It is also known as the Upper Mekong River. The Lancang river starts at Qinghai province, and flows through Xizang province(Tibet) and Yunnan province. Then the Lancang River becomes the border river between Laos and Burma.



Driven by economic reform in 1980, population growth, and high electricity demand, the Chinese government proposed the “West-East electricity transmission project” (Ioanides and Tilt, 2015; Magee, 2012). This project is incredibly important to China’s desire to boost economic development in the western part of the country and drive demand for clean energy. And the construction of dams inevitably displaces millions of people (Chang et al., 2010)



China's West-East Electricity Transfer (Created by David Tyler Gibson and James Conkling)



Meanwhile, the Yunnan government asked nationally regonized hydrologists to discover the potential capacity of hydropower development. Later, 14 cascade dams were designed and planned on the Lancang River, including Manwan, Dachaoshan, Xiaowan, and Nuozhadu(Wang et al, 2014). In 2020, the estimated magnitude of hydropower development on Lancang Jiang should reach 76.4% (Yan and Shi 2016).



Legend



Boundary


Lancang River


Lancang County


Fengqing County


Yun County


Dam(Hover over the point to see dam location)





Manwan Dam

Year Completed: 1995(source from international rivers)



Location: middle reach of the Lancang River



Ownership: At the beginning, it was co-owned by the Yunnan provincial government and the Chinese Ministry of Water Resources and Electirc Power. Currently, it is owned by Hydrolancang, a subsidiary of China Huaneng Group.



Measurement: height:132 m; crest length: 418 m; backwater: 70 km; inundation: 6225 mu (411 ha) of farmland and 8508 mu (562 ha) of woodlands



Details of resettlement: 114 villages in 8 townships and 4 counties(Jingdong, Yun, Fengqing, and Nanjian)



Manwan Dam(source:International Rivers)



Legend


Yun County


Boundary


Dam(Hover over the point to see displaced population info)




Dachaoshan Dam

Year Completed: 2003(source from international rivers)



Location:middle reach of the Lancang River



Ownership: Yunnan Dachaoshan Hydropower Co. Ltd



Measurement: height:111 m; crest length: 460.39 m; catchment area at dam site: 121000 km2; inundation: paddy field was 1562 mu, dry field was 4762 mu (Chinese National Committee on Large dams, and Tilt)




Dachaoshan dam(source: RCC dams)



Legend


Yun County


Boundary


Dam(Hover over the point to see displaced population info)




Xiaowan Dam


Year Completed: 2010(Chinese document)



Second tallest dam in the world



Location: middle reach of the Lancang River



Ownership: own by Hydrolancang, a subsidiary of China Huaneng Group



Measurement: height:292 m; crest length:902 m; Catchment area at dam site: 113300 km2



Xiaowan dam(Source:International Rivers)



Legend


Fengqing County


Boundary


Dam(Hover over the point to see displaced population info)




Nuozhadu Dam


Year Completed: 2012(source from international rivers)



Location: downstream of the Lancang River



Owenership: owned by Hydrolancang, a subsidiary of China Huaneng Group



Measurement:height: 261.5 m;crest length:608.16 m; catchment area: 144710 km2



Nuozhadu dam(source:Eco-bussiness.com)



Legend


Lancang County


Boundary


Dam(Hover over the point to see displaced population info)





The Lancang River Dam-induced Resettlement Survey(2010)


This survey data was obtained from Dr. Byran Tilt and researchers at Yunnan Normal University in Kunming City, China (2010). The data covers households from more than 30 villages in Fengqing, Yun and Lancang counties. The data was collected following a one-week training workshop, and the research team ensured the accuracy of the data by running quality control checks (Tilt and Gerkey 2016).



The survey used in this study had a cross-sectional structure: local, non-resettled communities are the control variable, chosen specifically because the non-resettled communities shared features, economic, demographic, etc., with the other resettled villages included in the survey. This study used this control to compare resettled communities at four dam sites.



Questions:


1.I feel loyal to other villagers.
我对这个村子的人感到忠诚



2.I am the same as other villagers.
我和住在这个村子的人一样



3.If I need advices, I will ask other villagers.
如果我需要建议,我会去询问这个村子的人



4.I believe that my neighbors will help me under urgent circumstance.
我相信紧急情况下我的邻居会帮助我



5.I would like to improve my village with other people.
我会和其他人一起合作来改善这个村子



6.I won’t move out from the village.
我不会搬离这里



7.In general, I love to live in the village.
总体来说,我喜欢住在这里



8.In general, I am happy.
总体来说,我很快乐



9.I often stop and greet other villagers.
我经常在路上停下和这个村子的人闲聊



10.My neighbors often come over to my home.
邻居经常来我家拜访



11.My neighbors and I often borrow and help each other.
我和邻居之间经常互借东西和互相帮忙



12.Individuals in this village will pay back the money.
这个村里的人借钱会还的



13.In general, I can believe most individuals in this village.
总体来说,我可以相信大多数村里的人



14.From the past five years, loyalty has improved in this village.
在过去的5年中,村里人的可信度有所提高



15.Compared to other villages, this village does not have many problems.
和别的村庄比,这个村庄没什么问题



16.Would you like to support a government project that does not benefit to your family but is good for the whole village?
现在有一个政府项目,这个项目对您家没有好处,但是对整个村子有好处,您是否还会支持



17.Individuals in this village can solve their own problems.
村里的人可以自己解决矛盾



Results:


Click the buttom to check out the results for this study.



Legend


Boundary


Lancang County


Fengqing County


Yun County


Dam(Hover over the point to see surveyed groups info)




Time of Adaptation


Displaced people use different coping strategies to adapt to their environments. Xi and Hwang (2011) have conducted a coping strategy analysis based on communities displaced from around the Three Gorges Dam. They stated that problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping are two popular strategies.



Problem-focused coping aims to let people earn back a sense of control by solving conflicts through negotiation, while emotion-focused coping aims to let people view their failure and turn it into an opportunity to improve the situation. Based on Questions 15 and 17, it is clear that all surveyed villages have problems. Villagers from the Manwan, Dachaoshan and Nuozhadu resettled communities have more faith in their ability to solve problems by themselves.



Tilt (2015) also reported that after facing income reductions due to failure of agriculture production, people switched their income sources from agriculture to small business, industrial sectors, or movement to urban areas.



Due to the limited sources available to discuss the adaptive resilience of resettled villages, more research into this issue should be done in the future.



Legend


Boundary


Lancang County


Fengqing County


Yun County


Dam(Hover over the point to see more info)







Compensation


Compensation is a key financial tool for resettlements. The purpose of compensation is to improve the wealth of resettled people and decrease inequality caused by displacement. Compensation aims to cover the material losses after relocation (Zhang et al., 2015).



In China, the central government provides laws and policies as a standard for compensation designers but the methods of measuring compensation vary between projects. After years of reform, the land management law and compensation policy added more details to the compensation design. Resettled villagers from the four dams considered in this study received different levels of compensation. The difference in compensation affects resettled villagers' financial resource for adaptation in the new community environment. Without sufficient and stable financial supports, resettled villagers are more likely to suffer a certain level of depression(Wilmsen et al, 2011).



The design of compensation packages occur early in the displacement process, and might be adjusted later. The actual displaced population from all projects are greater than the estimated population. Thus, some resettled villagers might not receive a full compensation package on time.



Legend



Boundary


Lancang County


Fengqing County


Yun County


Dam(Hover over the point to see more info)







Labor, Income and Resources


As Cernea (1997) mentioned in the risk and reconstruction model, impoverishment often becomes a problem for resettled villagers, even though they receive compensation. Almost 75% of the population in Yunnan are farmers, so arable agricultural land is a key resource to keep income stable.



Historically, people settled this area because it was easy to irrigate, had fertile soil, and a suitable climate for agriculture. However, when hydropower development rushed into the Lancang River Basin, these agricultural areas also became good locations for hydropower projects. As a result, it is difficult to find new, equally good agricultural areas for relocation (Chen, 2008). Manwan, Dachaoshan and Xiaowan reported a certain level of impoverishment in the resettled communities. Nuozhadu was under construction, so no report is associated with the issue.

Legend



Boundary


Lancang County


Fengqing County


Yun County


Dam(Hover over the point to see more info)







Demographics


Displacement plans normally ignore cultural elements. Cultural diversity increased the negative impact to resettled communities (Chen, 2008).


The major ethnic groups in this study include Han, Yi, and Lahu populations, as well as small populations of Bulang, Dai, Hui, Jingpo, Hani, Wa and Yao people. Different ethnic identities lead to different choices in terms of styles of houses, agricultural products, clothes, customs, and social values. Most people have established their relationship by looking for people with familiar culture.



Meanwhile, older people spent most of their lives practicing traditional agricultural production. It is more difficult for them to adjust than the young people.



Rural agriculture is an important source of income for all villagers. The change of demographics is closely connected to and affects working age labor (18 to 60). (Anriquez and Stloukal, 2008)



Ethnicity and Age Graphics



Legend



Boundary


Lancang County


Fengqing County


Yun County


Dam(Hover over the point to see more info)







Limitations of This Project

There are some limitations that need to be considered in this study.

1. Due to the cross-sectional design of the 2010 Lancang River Dam-induced Resettlement Survey, causal inferences should be avoided.

2. When the survey was conducted, some resettled communities, like Manwan and Dachaoshan, had been resettled for longer periods of time. They were more likely to experience population change. Some people might not stay in the resettled communities, choosing to resettle to urban areas or other villages, so they were excluded from this survey. However, the reasons why people chose to leave resettled communities remains unknown, thus, it can be said that they may have left because of unsatisfied compensation, increased demand in urban labor, better income opportunities in other areas, a poor new community environment or because they couldn't gain control of their social life.

3. It is difficult to use quantitative methods to measure subjective feelings about a community environment. Due to cultural and age differences, people value their social relationships and subjective well-beings in different ways. For example, people feel happy in different ways. A farmer might feel happy because he earned money from his agricultural production and was able to feed his family. A fisherman might feel happy when he caught a sufficient amount of fish. A mushroom gatherer might feel happy if the rainy season brought a good amount of precipitation to feed the next year's mushroom growth. Thus, this section in the survey cannot provide details about people's choices of answers.

In the discussion section, although there is sufficient information about compensation of at the four dam sites, some uncertainties remain. It is still unknown why people received different compensation packages from the same dam projects. For example, the government built new brick houses for the Xiaowan displaced villages, but not all villagers received the same type of house. Also, the survey could not ask how people spent their compensation subsidy. Thus, it is hard to determine whether or not resettled villagers spent their subsidy to help adapt to their new life. Another limitation of comparing compensation is that not all compensation packages were delivered at the same time and it is unknown why. This time difference might cause some difficulty for resettled villagers to adjust to new community environments. Meanwhile, for the demographic information, a few people did not provide full information about their ethnicity or other family members' ethnicity but this should not make a significant difference. Due to the one child policy in China, some home owners might not be willing to put all family members in the survey but there is no evidence to support this assumption.




Conclusion

The issue of dam-induced displacement is complicated. Researchers and the national council have made efforts to improve the experience of displaced villages but negative impacts to resettled villagers still occur.

Although many reports indicate that the resettled communities experienced a certain level of social capital loss at resettled villages due to hydropower projects, this study showed that at three of four dam sites (Manwan, Dachaoshan, and Nuozhadu), resettled communities have a higher community environment satisfaction on many of surveyed questions. Based on the results of other studies on these issues, differences detected in this study in adaptive resilience of villagers, compensation packages, financial and human resources, and demographics of the villages might help explain the variation across the four dam sites.

Meanwhile, this study also draws a picture of non-resettled communities near dam sites. Those communities might also experience negative effects from dam-construction.

This study shows that future research is needed to learn more about how adaptive resilience of resettled villages affects community reconstruction, how financial and human resources play a role in community reconstruction, and what can be done to help resettled people from different ethnic groups to adapt to their new lives and cope with people from different culture.